Mackall, Crounse & Moore, PLC has joined Dewitt Ross & Stevens S.C.

The newly formed DeWitt Mackall Crounse & Moore S.C. will provide clients with enhanced legal services
and efficiencies as well as access to more than 100 attorneys practicing in nearly 30 areas of
law in Wisconsin and Minnesota.

Dismiss this message


News & Education

Back to Employment Law News Feed

Filter by:

Seventh Circuit Finds Confidentiality Agreement Unenforceable

The Seventh Circuit recently further defined the limits of confidentiality agreements. The Court cautioned companies that it will not blindly enforce confidentiality agreements by holding that it will only enforce agreements when the information sought to be protected is actually confidential in nature and reasonable steps have been taken to maintain that confidentiality.

In nClosures Inc. v. Block & Co., Inc., 770 F.3d 598 (7th Cir. 2014), nClosures entered into an agreement where it agreed to design metal casings for electronic tablets and Block & Co. agreed to manufacture them. At the beginning of the relationship, the parties entered into a confidentiality agreement. Months later, Block & Co. created its own design for metal casings and began manufacturing a competing product. The business relationship soured, and nClosures sued for breach of the confidentiality agreement. The District Court granted summary judgment in favor of Block & Co., finding the confidentiality agreement unenforceable because nClosures did not take reasonable steps to keep its proprietary information confidential.  nClosures appealed the District Court’s decision.

The Seventh Circuit affirmed, acknowledging that courts applying Illinois law will enforce confidentiality agreements only when the information sought to be protected is actually confidential and reasonable steps are taken to keep the information confidential. In this case, while the parties’ principals signed the confidentiality agreement, no additional confidentiality agreements were signed by those who accessed the design files, the designs were not kept under lock and key or on a computer with limited access, and the designs were not marked confidential or proprietary. The Seventh Circuit determined that those facts showed that nClosures did not take reasonable steps to protect the confidentiality of its proprietary information and, therefore, its confidentiality agreement was unenforceable.

Although the Court applied Illinois law, companies in states that are within the Seventh Circuit’s jurisdiction should interpret this case as a call to action. A signature on a confidentiality agreement is not enough. Companies should be engaging in reasonable efforts to keep proprietary information confidential, such as restricting access, consistently enforcing confidentiality agreements, and taking various other steps. If you have any questions about whether or not your company is engaging in reasonable efforts to keep proprietary information confidential, please do not hesitate to contact your DeWitt Ross & Stevens attorney.

About the Author

Jordan  Rohlfing is an associate in DeWitt's litigation practice group. She is dedicated to providing top-quality legal services for all of her clients. Working with partners at DeWitt, Jordan has assisted with post-employment restrictive covenant disputes, civil litigation, breach of contract cases, real estate transactions, as well as employment law matters. 

Contact Jordan by email or phone (608) 283-5509.


One of the best features about our website articles and blog entries is that they are timely—you get up-to-date information on the law as it exists at the time. The downside is that the law changes, but our older entries don't. That means we can't guarantee you are getting the most current law when reading through past entries.

Please don't take these articles and blog entries and rely on them as legal advice. Give us a call instead, for specific and pointed advice for your particular situation. Note that contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship, unless you are accepted as a client of the firm.

Our Locations


Two East Mifflin Street, Suite 600
Madison, WI 53703
(608) 255-8891
Get Directions

Greater Milwaukee

13845 Bishop’s Drive, Suite 300
Brookfield, WI 53005
(262) 754-2840
Get Directions


2100 AT&T Tower,
901 Marquette Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55402
(612) 305-1400
Get Directions

Get to know us

DeWitt Ross & Stevens S.C., including its affiliate DeWitt Mackall Crounse & Moore S.C., is one of the ten largest law firms based in Wisconsin, with an additional presence in Minnesota. It has nearly140 attorneys practicing in Madison, Metropolitan Milwaukee and Minneapolis in over 30 legal practice areas, and has the experience to service clients of all scopes and sizes.

Our People
Our Law Firm
Areas of Expertise
News & Education
Contact Us


We are an active and proud member of Lexwork International, an association of mid-sized independent law firms in major cities located throughout the Americas, Europe and Asia.


Best Lawyers 2013 – 2018
Compass Award 2012
Top 100 Lawyers: National Trial Lawyers Association

  • blf-badge-2016
  • blf-badge-2017
  • Ramac Member Logo
  • blf-badge-2018


While we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Accordingly, please do not send us any information about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from us that we represent you (an “engagement letter”). You will not be a client of the firm until you receive such an engagement letter.

The best way for you to initiate a possible representation is to call DeWitt Ross & Stevens at 608-255-8891. We will make every effort to put you in touch with a lawyer suited to handle your matter. When you receive an engagement letter from one of our lawyers, you will be our client and we may exchange information freely.

Please click the “OK” button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.